By 

Carl E. Johnson Jr. “cejjpj” –

  

Notice that the title is not “The Fifty Greatest Golf Courses.” My title would be, “Fifty Interesting Places to Play Golf.” Whether it’s my title or the real title, the emphasis is on “places to play,” or “destinations,” not golf courses per se. More than fifty golf courses are covered. Which is not to say that the book does not include a lot of great golf courses. The format is mini-coffee table, with several pages of text for each destination and one small picture for most of the destinations. The quality of the printing, photo reproduction and binding in my copy is excellent. The text for each destination has been volunteered by a different prominent golf person. For example, Nick Faldo writes about the Royal Melborne Golf Club (West Course) in the Australian state of Victoria. Alice Dye about the TPC Sawgrass Stadium Course (see a connection there?). On the plus side are the quality of the color photos and the introduction (to me) of golf courses in some far away places (e.g., Bhutan, Morocco, India, places, however, I’ll never get to). On the minus side, I don’t have a prayer of playing some of the U.S. courses, even after I die (e.g., Pine Valley, Sand Hills, National Golf Links of America), which, honestly, the author points out. Finally, why not at least one photo for each destination? From the two page description of the Pacific Grove muni: “[T]he back nine . . . takes you right out to the water and combines incredible views of the Pacific and Monterey Bay with windswept bluffs reminiscent of some of the great courses of Scotland and Ireland.” Why no photo of this course? From the two page description of the Torekov Golf Club in Sweden (my ancestral home): “. . .a links-oriented course. . . You can view the sea from all eighteen holes. In the summer, wildflowers are blooming everywhere . . . .” I want a photo, darn it!

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 

Was this review helpful to you? 

|

 Comment